Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page Redesign"

From Scan New England Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(TOC)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
  
 
Thanks scott.... all we need to decide is a color scheme.  I've stuck with the dark green and light blue, like in your logo.
 
Thanks scott.... all we need to decide is a color scheme.  I've stuck with the dark green and light blue, like in your logo.
 +
 +
== Quicklists/TOC ==
 +
 +
Why don't we take the work Quicklist out of the Quicklist box on the right, its redundant and just wraps on a small screen and makes the page longer.  And rather than the shortened table of contents I would rather see us leverage the wiki levels of headings:
 +
the ==, ===, ====, etc
 +
So that things are consistent with any style changes across the wiki.
 +
 +
Let me know what you think, but other than that I think it looks great...
 +
 +
[[User:Gzub|Geoff]]
 +
 +
== TOC ==
 +
 +
I thought the TOC was too long before, so I shortened it. I think everything looks great now... I took out the "quicklist" word out of the links on the right side box.  ~matt

Latest revision as of 12:46, 26 October 2005

I really like the design, is there a way to put the table of contents above the quicklists, but have it colapsed by default? I would post the page in the message forum to get other peoples input. -- Geoff

shortened up the TOC and put it ahead of the quicklists ~ scanrjok

Nifty

I was beginning to think that a redesign might be a good idea, as the page is getting "long". Nice work, guys. On another note I created a forum for Wiki discussion at the message forums:

Wiki Discussion Forum

Have fun!

Colors

Thanks scott.... all we need to decide is a color scheme. I've stuck with the dark green and light blue, like in your logo.

Quicklists/TOC

Why don't we take the work Quicklist out of the Quicklist box on the right, its redundant and just wraps on a small screen and makes the page longer. And rather than the shortened table of contents I would rather see us leverage the wiki levels of headings:

the ==, ===, ====, etc

So that things are consistent with any style changes across the wiki.

Let me know what you think, but other than that I think it looks great...

Geoff

TOC

I thought the TOC was too long before, so I shortened it. I think everything looks great now... I took out the "quicklist" word out of the links on the right side box. ~matt