Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page Redesign"
m (→Colors) |
(TOC) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Thanks scott.... all we need to decide is a color scheme. I've stuck with the dark green and light blue, like in your logo. | Thanks scott.... all we need to decide is a color scheme. I've stuck with the dark green and light blue, like in your logo. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Quicklists/TOC == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Why don't we take the work Quicklist out of the Quicklist box on the right, its redundant and just wraps on a small screen and makes the page longer. And rather than the shortened table of contents I would rather see us leverage the wiki levels of headings: | ||
| + | the ==, ===, ====, etc | ||
| + | So that things are consistent with any style changes across the wiki. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Let me know what you think, but other than that I think it looks great... | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Gzub|Geoff]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | == TOC == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I thought the TOC was too long before, so I shortened it. I think everything looks great now... I took out the "quicklist" word out of the links on the right side box. ~matt | ||
Latest revision as of 12:46, 26 October 2005
I really like the design, is there a way to put the table of contents above the quicklists, but have it colapsed by default? I would post the page in the message forum to get other peoples input. -- Geoff
shortened up the TOC and put it ahead of the quicklists ~ scanrjok
Contents
Nifty
I was beginning to think that a redesign might be a good idea, as the page is getting "long". Nice work, guys. On another note I created a forum for Wiki discussion at the message forums:
Have fun!
Colors
Thanks scott.... all we need to decide is a color scheme. I've stuck with the dark green and light blue, like in your logo.
Quicklists/TOC
Why don't we take the work Quicklist out of the Quicklist box on the right, its redundant and just wraps on a small screen and makes the page longer. And rather than the shortened table of contents I would rather see us leverage the wiki levels of headings:
the ==, ===, ====, etc
So that things are consistent with any style changes across the wiki.
Let me know what you think, but other than that I think it looks great...
TOC
I thought the TOC was too long before, so I shortened it. I think everything looks great now... I took out the "quicklist" word out of the links on the right side box. ~matt